SCOTUSblog on MSN
In tariff cases, verbs rather than major pronouncements about presidential power give the court the off-ramp it’s looking for
Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state.
The three Trump-appointed Supreme Court justices shared apparent interest in legal rationales that could deliver the ...
While the industry is watching the case closely, one expert said a ruling against Donald Trump likely won't get the industry ...
President Donald Trump told reporters Thursday it would be “devastating for our country” if he lost a Supreme Court case that ...
If the Supreme Court rules that President Trump's tariffs are illegal, officials may face the unprecedented task of refunding ...
18hon MSN
Supreme Court ruling against Trump on IEEPA wouldn't mean the end of all tariffs, experts say
Trade experts expect some U.S. tariffs to remain elevated even if the Supreme Court strikes down President Trump's IEEPA ...
The Supreme Court nullifying Trump’s tariffs could give consumers a reprieve from continually rising prices—but may not stop ...
Justice Neil Gorsuch said he was concerned by the administration's assertion that the tariffs are permissible because of the ...
President Donald Trump on Thursday was asked about the Supreme Court arguments on his tariff policy. Trump said “we did very ...
President Trump said he will develop a "game two plan" to carry out his tariff agenda in case the Supreme Court rules against ...
A majority of Supreme Court justices on Wednesday expressed skepticism about President Donald Trump claiming tariff power ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results