Trump's tariff case is among the most highly anticipated cases to come before the Supreme Court this term — and experts say ...
The three Trump-appointed Supreme Court justices shared apparent interest in legal rationales that could deliver the ...
While the industry is watching the case closely, one expert said a ruling against Donald Trump likely won't get the industry ...
SCOTUSblog on MSN
In tariff cases, verbs rather than major pronouncements about presidential power give the court the off-ramp it’s looking for
Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state.
President Donald Trump told reporters Thursday it would be “devastating for our country” if he lost a Supreme Court case that ...
The temporary ruling by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, blocking a lower court order to fully fund the aid, added to the ...
President Trump said he will develop a "Game 2 plan" to carry out his agenda in case the Supreme Court rules against his ...
Mediaite on MSNOpinion
‘That Is a Lie!’ MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell Torches Trump Answer on Bombshell Supreme Court Case
Lawrence O’Donnell blasted Trump’s responses to the beating his trade policies took at the Supreme Court this week, flatly ...
Brazil’s top court rejects Bolsonaro’s coup sentence appeal, affirming his 27-year penalty for post-election power grab.
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday over President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs. Trump justified his import taxes under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
The justices are generally reluctant to take account of a president’s public statements. But extensive quotes from Mr. Trump in a key filing may change the legal calculus.
"The more likely scenarios would all have Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch voting to strike down the IEEPA tariffs or to curtail ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results