Trump, Supreme Court and tariffs
Digest more
SCOTUSblog on MSN
In tariff cases, verbs rather than major pronouncements about presidential power give the court the off-ramp it’s looking for
Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state. Verbs, verbs, verbs.
We don’t expect any demand from China to return to the U.S. market with this change,’ said one trader at an international trading company. ‘Brazil is cheaper than the United States and even non-Chinese buyers are taking Brazilian cargoes.
Toyota, Honda and Nissan forecast big hits to their profits from higher tariffs that they acknowledged were likely ‘here to stay.’
Whirlpool balances US manufacturing strengths with debt challenges and takeover interest. Click here to read an analysis of WHR stock now.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott says he’ll impose a 100% tariff on New Yorkers moving to Texas after Election Day amid the city’s heated Cuomo–Mamdani mayoral race.
In arguments before the Supreme Court, the White House backed away from its claims that President Trump’s tariffs were about raising revenue.
The chances of businesses getting tariff refunds grew significantly on Wednesday after the Trump administration’s case to keep most of his levies in place was met with deep skepticism from multiple conservative and liberal justices.
1don MSN
The conservative justices nerded out on legal theory, and other takeaways from the tariff arguments
While Trump seeks to advance his trade agenda, some conservative justices appeared eager to advance an agenda of their own. Members of the court’s GOP-appointed majority sharply questioned the administration’s tariffs using a pair of legal doctrines important to conservatives’ long-running battle to rein in the so-called administrative state.